>So, when the farmers stop farming becauser they can't buy the seed, are the >big *head honchos* going to go hungry too??
They don't seem to think of that kind of angle much. >Seems the only route left open >is to "grow yer own" - Indeed, and join seed-saving and sharing networks. It's worth the effort to plant some varieties just to help keep them going, even if you don't really need the crop. We're doing that at the moment with old varieties of wheat, barley and rye, plus millet, rice and corn come summer. There are still good seed companies though, but more and more of them get bought out by the big guys. I think some of the little guys can't be bought out, but maybe they can be squeezed out. >"they" can't toss everyone in the cooler for having >seeds... remember - we are the many - "they" are the few.... Yea verily. On the other hand that's just what they do with cannabis smokers, and they seem quite unfazed by the grotesquely high prison populations, nor by the obvious fact that it's ineffective - well, apart from all the unfortunate side-effects, that is, they're very effective, but it doesn't stop people smoking dope. Heritage seeds and local networks or not, I think a major problem with this seed company bid for Total Control is that an erosion of varieties will inevitably ensue, following the severe erosion that's already happened because of seed industrialisation - and right at a time when global warming and climate change mean we're likely to need all the varieties we can get, the old, proven, tried and tested, everlasting traditional "heritage" varieties developed by careful farmers and growers worldwide through the centuries, not just a handful of rather useless corporate hybrids and GMOs. http://journeytoforever.org/seeds.html Seeds of the world (See next message, also from GRAIN.) Best Keith >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <biofuel@sustainablelists.org> >Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 9:06 AM >Subject: [Biofuel] Seed Companies Want To Ban Farm-saved Seed > > > > New from GRAIN > > February 2007 > > http://www.grain.org/?nfg=470 > > > > > > SEED COMPANIES WANT TO BAN FARM-SAVED SEED > > > > A new report from GRAIN reveals the new lobbying offensive from the > > global seed industry to make it a crime for farmers to save seeds for > > the next year's planting. This briefing traces the recent discussions > > within the seed industry and explores what will happen if a plant > > variety right becomes virtually indistinguishable from a patent. > > > > BACKGROUND > > > > Seed companies already have strong legal support from governments. In > > many countries, seed laws require farmers to use only certified seed > > of government-approved varieties. That seed is often available only > > from commercial seed companies. > > > > A rapidly increasing number of governments also grant legal monopoly > > rights for commercial seed, by means of industrial patents and > > so-called plant variety protection (PVP). Until recently, both seed > > patents and PVP existed only in developed countries. But since the > > World Trade Organisation (WTO) was created in 1994, all member > > governments must provide some form of monopoly rights on seeds. There > > is now enormous pressure on developing countries to adopt the > > developed country models. Many have been persuaded to join the > > international PVP system, managed by UPOV (International Union for > > the Protection of New Varieties of Plants). In the past ten years, > > UPOV has more than doubled its membership. Most new members are > > developing countries. > > > > The UPOV system was originally set up in 1961, in response to many > > years of lobbying by the seed industry. What the companies really > > wanted was to have industrial patents on seeds. Patents give absolute > > rights to control all uses of the seed, both for planting and for > > further breeding. But at the time many governments felt that patents > > would give industry too much power over farmers. The UPOV PVP was > > created as a compromise. From the beginning, it gave seed companies a > > monopoly on only the commercial multiplication and the marketing of > > seeds. Farmers remained free to save seed from their own harvest to > > plant in the following year, and other breeders could freely use any > > variety, protected or not, to develop a new one. > > > > During the 1980s, the development of genetic engineering attracted > > large transnational companies from the pharmaceuticals and chemical > > sectors into plant breeding. With their much greater lobbying power, > > they began a new offensive to strengthen monopoly rights on plant > > breeding in developed countries. First, they got industrial patents > > on plants bred with genetic engineering (GE) and related techniques. > > This meant, in practice, that they got the absolute monopoly that > > conventional breeders had been refused two decades earlier. > > > > Second, the UPOV PVP rights were radically expanded for all plant > > varieties, GE or conventional. Since 1991, the PVP monopoly has > > applied not only to seed multiplication but also to the harvest and > > sometimes the final product as well. The previously unlimited right > > for farmers to save seed for the following year's planting has been > > changed into an optional exception. Only if the national government > > allows it can farm-saved seed still be used, and a royalty has to be > > paid to the seed company even for seeds grown on-farm. > > > > Third, these much stronger monopoly rights are required for > > membership in the WTO, as already described. This is the starting > > point for the new lobby offensive now being prepared by the global > > seed industry. The goal this time is to remove the few remaining > > differences between the PVP system and patents, so that companies > > will have an absolute monopoly over seeds all over the world, > > regardless of which legal system is used, for all crops and all > > countries. > > > > THE REAL TARGET - FARM-SAVED SEED > > > > Farm-saved seed will be a primary target of this offensive. At least > > two-thirds of the global crop area is currently planted with > > farm-saved seed every year. In many developing countries, it > > represents 80--90 per cent of all seed used, but even in developed > > countries it commonly accounts for a large share (30--60 per cent). > > If farmers were legally forced to plant all of this area with > > commercial seed, it could easily mean a doubling of seed industry > > turnover, that is, an extra US$20 billion annually -- all taken out > > of farmers' pockets and delivered to transnational giants such as > > DuPont, Bayer, Syngenta, and Monsanto. > > > > Another key industry demand will be to restrict or eliminate the > > freedom to use PVP-protected varieties for breeding -- the other > > major difference between the UPOV system and patents. The purpose is > > simply to block competition. If nobody else is allowed to improve on > > a variety until after the term of protection -- 20 years or so -- a > > seed company will be able to sell the unimproved variety for a much > > longer period, and postpone the cost of new research. The net effect: > > increased profits for the PVP owner, higher seed prices and fewer new > > varieties for farmers. > > > > The seed industry has every reason to fear competition from > > farm-saved seed and more innovative independent breeders. Even > > individual farmers can often match or beat the performance of > > commercial varieties by simple on-farm selection. With constantly > > stronger monopoly rights and increasing consolidation into a few > > giant conglomerates, seed companies have produced fewer and fewer > > products of value to farmers. The big strides in yield and resistance > > improvement were made early in the 20th century, before any monopoly > > rights were available on seeds. And those improvements came mainly > > from selecting and crossing the very best of the thousands of farmer > > varieties which had been developed over centuries, not from any > > industry-sponsored research. > > > > The failure of commercial plant breeding has left global agriculture > > badly prepared for the challenges of the near future, such as climate > > change and the need to wean ourselves off dependence on fossil fuels. > > It is now time to start rolling back the monopoly privileges of the > > seed industry, not to strengthen them further. > > > > =========================================================== > > > > GRAIN, The end of farm-saved seed? Industry's wish-list for the next > > revision of UPOV, GRAIN Briefing, February 2007, > > http://www.grain.org/briefings/?id=202, available in PDF and HTML. > > The summary in PDF is also available on this page. Also currently > > available in French, and soon in Spanish. _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
