On 20 Apr 2006 at 15:13, Jeff Schiller wrote: > This is why I feel OpenLaszlo is a good option. It's an open-source > higher-level XML-based application language that gets "compiled" into > an output that a renderer understands. > > Laszlo currently supports Flash only as an output but they are working > on supporting DHTML officially by the end of the year. My > understanding is that XAML is another eventual output target and it > would make sense for them to be including SVG into their "DHTML"
I'm an OpenLaszlo fan, too .. but rather than gambling on OpenLaszlo (possibly later) rendering DHTML+SVG .. it is much easier (today) to display different types of objects in multiple div containers. e.g. right now as an experiment I'm playing with OpenLaszlo + SVG + PHP + DENG .. views all written into different containers in the browser using CSS. Attributes of external containers (e.g. SVG) are switched by calling javascript functions in parent wrapper page, called from within OpenLaszlo code. e.g. LzBrowser.loadJS(); -> invokes parent javascript functions -> controls divs/iframes So SVG <--> OpenLaszlo is my current interest. Unfortunately, although DENG does renders SVG nicely inside an OpenLaszlo canvas via a recently built DengLaszlo.swf API, the interactivity of SVG is lost. So raw SVG rendered in a separate HTML div/iframe container is better for my own "hybrid" experiments. DL [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
