On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 01:02:58PM -0400, David Dailey wrote:
.
.
.
> Do getSVGDocument() and contentDocument do exactly the same thing? It would
> appear that they do. I used to avoid the latter since it seemed to only work
> in Firefox (which it seems didn't support getSVGDocument() in some contexts
> in olden days), but browsers seem happy with either now (though I didn't try
> ASV).
.
.
.
Me, too. I don't know the answer. Google has code which uses
one, and refers to the other in an accompanying comment. On
the whole, right now I feel slightly more inclined to use
contentDocument--note, though, that I would have given a differ-
ent answer yesterday. I have *not* found a rigorous comparison
of the two.
------------------------------------
-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [email protected]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my
membership"
----Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
