On 07/05/2007 10:06 AM Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Alexandru Stanoi wrote:
>> Tobias Schlitt wrote: >>> On 07/05/2007 08:54 AM Alexandru Stanoi wrote: >>>> I just like it better this way. And it seems more organized to have all >>>> related classes in one folder. >>> If that is your personal taste, its ok for me, but we should keep it >>> consistent in all components. Otherwise it is hard for other developers >>> to dig into the components you maintain. Therefore: Please revert this >>> patch! >> Maybe the others have another opinion? If all votes are against me then >> I will revert. >> >> And nobody noticed that the same is in Authentication and SignalSlot? > I think we discussed at the start of the project to keep all class of > the same type (structs, exceptions, options) in the same directory with > this name. So I think it should be reverted, and fixed for SignalSlot > and Authentication. I agree. Beside that, we should set up a document describing this. AFAIK we don't have one, yet, right? Regards, Toby -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Med vennlig hilsen / With kind regards Tobias Schlitt (GPG: 0xC462BC14) eZ Components Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | eZ Systems AS | ez.no -- svn-components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/svn-components
