On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Tobias Schlitt wrote: > On 07/05/2007 10:06 AM Derick Rethans wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Alexandru Stanoi wrote: > > >> Tobias Schlitt wrote: > > >>> On 07/05/2007 08:54 AM Alexandru Stanoi wrote: > > >>>> I just like it better this way. And it seems more organized to have all > >>>> related classes in one folder. > >>> If that is your personal taste, its ok for me, but we should keep it > >>> consistent in all components. Otherwise it is hard for other developers > >>> to dig into the components you maintain. Therefore: Please revert this > >>> patch! > >> Maybe the others have another opinion? If all votes are against me then > >> I will revert. > >> > >> And nobody noticed that the same is in Authentication and SignalSlot? > > > I think we discussed at the start of the project to keep all class of > > the same type (structs, exceptions, options) in the same directory with > > this name. So I think it should be reverted, and fixed for SignalSlot > > and Authentication. > > I agree. Beside that, we should set up a document describing this. AFAIK > we don't have one, yet, right?
I thought we had, but I can't find it now. So I'll add this to the guidelines soon - pending discussion. regards, Derick -- svn-components mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ez.no/mailman/listinfo/svn-components
