On 11/13/2015 1:00 PM, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Bryan:
> 
> This looks like a decent thing to do..
> 
> Still wondering why changing the callout.h header file would not have caused
> things to recompile to pick up the new argument..
> 
> We can do it this way though it looks fine.
> 
> You want to commit it or I?

Well your change is totally safe for compiling. It's just not KBI
backwards compat for older modules. This is not typically a problem but
I think in this case it is worth doing to avoid random data coming into
the 'drain' argument if loading an older module.

I'll do a test build and commit it. Perhaps this is what was leading to
Alexander's panics.

I haven't analyzed the return value issue at all.


-- 
Regards,
Bryan Drewery

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to