Den 22/12/2009 kl. 15.18 skrev Roman Divacky: > well... llvm provides its own assembler so if the need for newer binutils > comes from need of newer as I believe llvm can help here. or is the linker > the problem?
It does? I was under the impression that this was still very much a WIP (http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#mc) and that LLVM still uses the system assembler and linker. Erik
