On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 04:49:48PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Den 22/12/2009 kl. 15.18 skrev Roman Divacky: > > > well... llvm provides its own assembler so if the need for newer binutils > > comes from need of newer as I believe llvm can help here. or is the linker > > the problem? > > It does? I was under the impression that this was still very much a WIP > (http://llvm.org/releases/2.6/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#mc) and that LLVM still > uses the system assembler and linker.
yes, it's a WIP. what I meant was that there's not so much pressure to import newer "as" as we might be getting that from llvm anyway in the time frame... _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
