In message: <20091224144136.ga28...@edoofus.dev.vega.ru>
Ruslan Ermilov <r...@freebsd.org> writes:
: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:19:25PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
: > In the short term I think we are well served on all fronts to modify
: > the build architecture to better support compilers from ports. This
: > would actually help with the llvm/clang testing too, and sidestep the
: > problems of gplv3 stuff being in the base. TMK there has been no work
: > on this direction at all, which is disappointing.
:
: If you take GNU binutils/compiler from ports, I think we can already
: do this, and without any changes to the build architecture. It's
: just a matter of defining several make(1) variables, like CC, CXX,
: CPP, LD, AS, NM, AR, specifying full paths of the desired binaries,
: plus some environment variables (at least STRIPBIN, so that install(1)
: calls the correct strip(1) binary).
Don't you have to replace them as a pair? And the list of variables
is kinda long... And there's no real way to say use gcc from the
tree, but use binutils from ports.
Warner
_______________________________________________
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
