On Jun 2, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> .. and actually, bikeshedding for a moment, would we be able to move a > lot of these accessor methods over to inlines? Would that break the > Juniper way of doing things? That would definitely break Juniper as it doesn't give a stable ABI. I've suggested an approach that allows for both, but it was deemed unnecessary. The argument being that the function call overhead is negligible. We can always revisit that decision if needed... -- Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
