On 2 June 2014 12:03, Ian Lepore <i...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 11:42 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> On Jun 2, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> > .. and actually, bikeshedding for a moment, would we be able to move a >> > lot of these accessor methods over to inlines? Would that break the >> > Juniper way of doing things? >> >> That would definitely break Juniper as it doesn't give a stable >> ABI. >> >> I've suggested an approach that allows for both, but it was deemed >> unnecessary. The argument being that the function call overhead is >> negligible. >> >> We can always revisit that decision if needed... >> > > In my experience, function call overhead is anything but minimal, > especially on ARM platforms.
Same on MIPS. -a _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
