On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 11:42 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Jun 2, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Adrian Chadd <adr...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > .. and actually, bikeshedding for a moment, would we be able to move a > > lot of these accessor methods over to inlines? Would that break the > > Juniper way of doing things? > > That would definitely break Juniper as it doesn't give a stable > ABI. > > I've suggested an approach that allows for both, but it was deemed > unnecessary. The argument being that the function call overhead is > negligible. > > We can always revisit that decision if needed... >
In my experience, function call overhead is anything but minimal, especially on ARM platforms. -- Ian _______________________________________________ svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
