| From: D. Hugh Redelmeier <[email protected]>
| Thanks, Paul, for dealing with the one I reported.
Paul's commit was 22e805518d6948b1991fd5d97a004a361a903af4
It removed a lot of definitions of conn us (and some others).
Unfortunately there are still references to conn us. All six
that I've found have been in
baseconfigs/all/etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.conf.common
Of course they fail. The failure is silent except on my system.
I'm just going to delete them for now. That hardly seems dangerous
because conn us is never defined. But before Paul's change, it was
sometimes defined.
That leaves several pointless conns. It makes me wonder whether the right
choice would have been to define conn us more places, not fewer. But as
what? Where?
conn us-clear
also=clear
conn us-clear-or-private
also=clear-or-private
conn us-private-or-clear
also=private-or-clear
conn us-private-or-clear-all
also=private-or-clear
conn us-private
also=private
conn us-block
also=block
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
