Those are all old obsolete conns not used since freeswan. Just delete them all
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 4, 2017, at 18:02, D. Hugh Redelmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > > | From: D. Hugh Redelmeier <[email protected]> > > | Thanks, Paul, for dealing with the one I reported. > > Paul's commit was 22e805518d6948b1991fd5d97a004a361a903af4 > > It removed a lot of definitions of conn us (and some others). > > Unfortunately there are still references to conn us. All six > that I've found have been in > baseconfigs/all/etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.conf.common > Of course they fail. The failure is silent except on my system. > > I'm just going to delete them for now. That hardly seems dangerous > because conn us is never defined. But before Paul's change, it was > sometimes defined. > > That leaves several pointless conns. It makes me wonder whether the right > choice would have been to define conn us more places, not fewer. But as > what? Where? > > conn us-clear > also=clear > > conn us-clear-or-private > also=clear-or-private > > conn us-private-or-clear > also=private-or-clear > > conn us-private-or-clear-all > also=private-or-clear > > conn us-private > also=private > > conn us-block > also=block > _______________________________________________ > Swan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
