Re: [SWCollect] Sierra/Lucas/Tolkien/Ultima/AD&D/SSI - info and questions

[Jukka Eronen]

>Is that the one offerred in the Melbourne House game?  Can you send me the >link, Jukka?  I don't believe I've seen it yet. Yes, it's the one sold thru LOTR: Game One; there's a quote about it from my earlier answer at the end of this mail. All of my collections are viewable at my site (minus the ones I'm selling/trading). It's here at the bottom of Tolkien page: http://kotimbnet.fi/psychic/_eng_games_tolkien.html [Zak] > Your pictures show an Amiga version and your list says you have an Amiga > version?  Do you really not? I was writing at night and my mind wasn't too clear :) So I meant to say my C64 versions has that 1988 box, and PC and Amiga have 1989 box. And I had _another_ Amiga-version earlier which was 1989 (duplicate to the one I have now). But actually, to add the confusion, that latter picture is from the PC-version; the platform sticker just has fallen off. The boxes are identical though. > My copy is an Amiga version and says 1988 on the back.  The lower right > picture is the picture of Zak in front of the Yak. It is possibe the C64 > version of the game just has different pictures on the back. The printing under the C64-sticker in front would tell a lot... - Jukka -- http://koti.mbnet.fi/psychic/eng_index.html >I bought it couple of monts ago from UK. >It was only available for purchasers of LOTR: Game One >in Great Britain, Channel Islands and the Isle of Mann >(that last place always amuses me; if you've seen >The Fast Show you know what I mean :). > >I don't know anyone else who owns one. >This is the regular version; the price mentioned >in  for a deluxe-one is outrageous. >My PC-version of LOTR: Game One -manual (was it 1987?) >doesn't include the offer anymore. > >Though the product itself isn't as classy as one would expect. >The wooden frame is poorly/uneavenly cut >and it bothers a bit that Nazgul is handwritten >just like that as it should be Nazg�l. > >At least Tolkien doesn't write it any other way. >I have LOTR as a text file where I just checked; >I own a printed copy too so this shouldn't be a legal problem :). >BTW does anyone have Silmarillion as text ? > >The hologram itself is surely very cool, >though maybe a bit comic :).