>
> 1) Do you agree about using “associatedtype”?
> 2) If not, which keyword would you prefer to use? why? (you can introduce
> a new one)
There is another alternative. Rather than trying to come up with another
brand-new keyword, we can re-use one that has an existing and appropriate
meaning: required.
Example:
protocol ExampleProtocol {
required typealias Element
typealias MethodSignature = (arg: Element) -> Bool
... etc
}
It's a little more verbose at the point of use but the declarations are
relatively uncommon and this usage is clearly separate from regular
typealias declarations.
Mike
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
