> On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Matt Whiteside via swift-evolution > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just want to put 2 other ideas out there for completeness: > > `relatedtype` > > `componenttype`
My 2c: if we’re tack something onto “type”, the only appropriate modifier is “associated.” “Associated type” isn’t a term we invented; it’s the correct accepted technical term for the role these declarations play in generic programming. > >> On Dec 23, 2015, at 14:30, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 23, 2015, at 1:53 PM, Michel Fortin via swift-evolution >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> inferredtype >> >> It’s not always inferred, though. >> >> - Doug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution -Dave _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
