> On Dec 23, 2015, at 3:08 PM, Dave Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 23, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Matt Whiteside via swift-evolution
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Just want to put 2 other ideas out there for completeness:
>>
>> `relatedtype`
>>
>> `componenttype`
>
> My 2c: if we’re tack something onto “type”, the only appropriate modifier is
> “associated.” “Associated type” isn’t a term we invented; it’s the correct
> accepted technical term for the role these declarations play in generic
> programming.
Agreed.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
