> Now lint … lint I’m not sure about. It’s problematic as soon as you try to
> establish a standard, as we’ve already established on this list in the
> “mandatory self” discussion. The truth is that I don’t care about a third
> party lib’s weird formatting decisions nearly as much as I care about its
> tests passing.
Here by “lint” I mean packaging concerns for linting, specifically: is the
semantic version the package claims *correct*. Code standards are not part of
the publishing lint step as indeed, this seems excessive and not a decision for
us to make.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
