> On Jan 5, 2016, at 3:15 PM, Paul Cantrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 5, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Max Howell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Now lint … lint I’m not sure about. It’s problematic as soon as you try to >>> establish a standard, as we’ve already established on this list in the >>> “mandatory self” discussion. The truth is that I don’t care about a third >>> party lib’s weird formatting decisions nearly as much as I care about its >>> tests passing. >> >> Here by “lint” I mean packaging concerns for linting, specifically: is the >> semantic version the package claims *correct*. Code standards are not part >> of the publishing lint step as indeed, this seems excessive and not a >> decision for us to make. > > Ah, that makes much more sense! Sorry for being slow on the uptake. Yes, > programmatic validation of semantic versioning seems like a fine idea.
np, I should have been more specific. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
