On Jan 5, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Max Howell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Now lint … lint I’m not sure about. It’s problematic as soon as you try to >> establish a standard, as we’ve already established on this list in the >> “mandatory self” discussion. The truth is that I don’t care about a third >> party lib’s weird formatting decisions nearly as much as I care about its >> tests passing. > > Here by “lint” I mean packaging concerns for linting, specifically: is the > semantic version the package claims *correct*. Code standards are not part of > the publishing lint step as indeed, this seems excessive and not a decision > for us to make.
Ah, that makes much more sense! Sorry for being slow on the uptake. Yes, programmatic validation of semantic versioning seems like a fine idea. Cheers, P _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
