> On May 17, 2016, at 8:32 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Swift community,
> 
> The review of "SE-0089: Renaming String.init<T>(_: T)" begins now and runs 
> through May 23. The proposal is available here:
> 
>       
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md
> 
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
> 
>       https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
> manager.
> 
> What goes into a review?
> 
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
> through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift. When 
> writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your 
> review:
> 
>       * What is your evaluation of the proposal?

This method definitely has some strange behavior and I think it most certainly 
would benefit from a better name. `init<T>(printing value:<T>)` to me sounds 
like this is somehow printing the string, either to the console or to an arcane 
device called a “printer”. Personally I think that  `init<T>(describing 
value:<T>)` is more suitable as a name of an initializer.

>       * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change 
> to Swift?

Absolutely! It improves safety and clarity with little cost to developers

>       * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?

Most definitely

>       * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, 
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?

I have never run across this issue in another language/library. However I have 
previously attempted to avoid similar problems in C++ so I would definitely 
consider the standard of having good (and un-ambiguous names a strong benefit 
when it comes to potentially too generic methods)

>       * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick 
> reading, or an in-depth study?

I have personally run across bugs due to this in the wild and it definitely was 
unexpected and probably took me too long to recognize the reason on why it 
happened.

> 
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> 
>       https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -Chris Lattner
> Review Manager
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to