Hm. That might conflict with: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.swift.evolution/17575
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Austin Zheng via swift-evolution < [email protected]> wrote: > Excellent. Having one canonical, unambiguous way to get the string > representation should make things simpler and easier for developers. > > Austin > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> on Tue May 17 2016, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hello Swift community, >> > >> > The review of "SE-0089: Renaming String.init<T>(_: T)" begins now and >> > runs through May 23. The proposal is available here: >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md >> > >> > Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All >> > reviews should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at >> > >> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> > >> > or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the >> review manager. >> > >> > What goes into a review? >> > >> > The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review >> > through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of >> > Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might >> > want to answer in your review: >> > >> > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? >> > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a >> change to Swift? >> > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of >> Swift? >> > * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar >> > feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those? >> > * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick >> reading, or an in-depth study? >> > >> > More information about the Swift evolution process is available at >> > >> > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md >> >> I'm posting this on behalf of Dmitri Gribenko, and Max Moiseev, and >> myself. >> >> We would like to accept the proposal with one modification: rather than >> add an argument label, we'd like to drop the String initializer >> altogether, making `"\(expression)"` the standard way to get a string >> representation of `expression`. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> -Dave >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> > > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
