Hello Chris, Thank you for updating me, read this and other related info again thoroughly and will act accordingly. In the mean time I will work dynamically on dynamics :o) Currently I suspend my topic. and bring this back again much later but then tagged with [out of scope] If this is appropriate,
Have I understood this correctly, Is that OK? Ted > On 13 Oct 2016, at 07:58, Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Oct 12, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Ted F.A. van Gaalen via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> Hello Austin >> I haven’t read that from Chris - Must have overlooked it due to the shear >> volume on swift-evolution. > > Completely understandable, I’m sure you’re not the only one who has missed > this. > > That said, FWIW, the goals for Swift 4 and the current planning stage are > spelled out in the front-page of the swift-evolution repo: > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution > > As others’ have said, we are trying to approach the Swift 4 cycle based on > what we learned from Swift 2.2 and Swift 3. > > Thanks for understanding, > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
