This is both great to hear (ivar introspection available) and a little disappointing (method level not). Basically, I would hope for at least enough to allow implementation of KVC - which would require the ability to find and invoke methods by name.
> On Jan 24, 2017, at 14:16, Joe Groff <[email protected]> wrote: > > a lot of the information you'd need for many dynamic features is already > there, and planned to be stabilized as part of the ABI. We already emit > reflection data that describes the physical layouts of types, and once those > formats are stabilized, building a library that interprets the metadata is > additive (and could conceivably be done by a third party independent of the > standard library). There may not be metadata for individual methods yet
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
