> On Feb 2, 2017, at 10:29 PM, Ted kremenek <kreme...@apple.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 2, 2017, at 6:36 PM, Karl Wagner <razie...@gmail.com > <mailto:razie...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >>> On 3 Feb 2017, at 02:55, Ted kremenek <kreme...@apple.com >>> <mailto:kreme...@apple.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Karl Wagner via swift-evolution >>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >>> >>>> Personally I think that's an absurd reason not to move to a forum. What is >>>> your complaint? That it's _too_ inclusive? That others only have trivial >>>> things to say? Frankly, every way I try to interpret your comment makes it >>>> come off as snobbery. >>> >>> Hi Karl, >>> >>> I appreciate your candor here, but let's avoid making these comments sound >>> personal. This is a thread prompting polarized opinions, and most of it >>> has been civil and productive. Let's keep it that way. I do respect that >>> you are anxious to see progress on the resolution of the topic, but these >>> same points could be made in a less antagonistic way. >>> >>> I encourage all of you to re-read this part of the Code of Conduction on >>> Swift.org <http://swift.org/>: >>> >>>> Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: >>>> >>>> The use of sexualized language or imagery >>>> Personal attacks >>>> Trolling or insulting/derogatory comments >>>> Public or private harassment >>>> Publishing other’s private information, such as physical or electronic >>>> addresses, without explicit permission >>>> Other unethical or unprofessional conduct >>>> Project maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or >>>> reject comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other >>>> contributions that are not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban >>>> temporarily or permanently any contributor for other behaviors that they >>>> deem inappropriate, threatening, offensive, or harmful. >>>> >>> Thank you, >>> Ted >>> >> >> As I explained to Erica, it isn’t meant to be read personally. What I said >> is that the community should be as inclusive as possible and that >> prejudicing certain opinions as “trivial” conceptually runs against that. > > I appreciate that perspective — and I personally agree with that point. My > cautionary statement — which was also directed at others on the thread — was > to ensure that the thread remains amicable, and that our choice of our words > match our intentions as the arguments become potentially polarized.
"Trivial" describes the briefness of the response and *not* the quality of opinions. Quick back and forth comments that fit well on forums can produce an explosion of emails. Moving to a forum that supports email mirroring does not produce the same experience for those using mail clients. -- E
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
