> On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:36 AM, Matt Whiteside <mwhiteside....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I do like this proposed one-sided range syntax, but a while back it was 
> pointed out that it might conflict with a candidate syntax for variadic 
> generics.  Has anything changed there?

It does conflict with the straw man syntax described in the generics manifesto:

        
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#variadic-generics
 
<https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/docs/GenericsManifesto.md#variadic-generics>

but variadic generics are a long way off and the syntax is totally up in the 
air.

        - Doug

> -Matt
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2017, at 21:40, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution 
>> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Swift community,
>> 
>> The review of SE-0172 "One-sided Ranges" begins now and runs through April 
>> 23, 2017. The proposal is available here:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0172-one-sided-ranges.md
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0172-one-sided-ranges.md>
>> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews 
>> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
>> 
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution 
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review 
>> manager. When replying, please try to keep the proposal link at the top of 
>> the message:
>> 
>> Proposal link:
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0172-one-sided-ranges.md
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0172-one-sided-ranges.md>
>> Reply text
>> Other replies
>>  
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pulls#what-goes-into-a-review-1>What
>>  goes into a review?
>> 
>> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review 
>> through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of 
>> Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to 
>> answer in your review:
>> 
>> What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>> Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to 
>> Swift?
>> Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>> If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do 
>> you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>> How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or 
>> an in-depth study?
>> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>> 
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md 
>> <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> -Doug
>> 
>> Review Manager
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to