> Le 21 avr. 2017 à 01:18, Jonathan Hull <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Just to play devil’s advocate, depending on how the protocol actually works, > you could claim it *is* a RangeExpression (that is, it is something that can > be turned into a range). That was one of the proposals… I lost track of > which one was accepted.
Even in this case, this would be a capability, and the guidelines would then recommend RangeExpressible :-) Gwendal _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
