> During the discussion, people emphasized that dynamic features would be
> useful for more than Python interop, so if PyVal is the only way to get those
> benefits… I have no fear of JS-Bridges utilizing Python, or JSON-libraries
> build on top of PyVal — I just said that I don’t think it’s possible to
> prevent all abuses (adding restrictions might even cause abuse).
>
>
> So what if they do this highly theoretical thing? Is this going to be a
> superior way of programming? If yes, then let's all do it! If not, then a
> superior solution will eventually emerge. Are you afraid that the community
> will be "tainted" by bad code? That Foundation will be rewritten with PyVals?
> And then you will be forced to write in PyVals too? What's the issue here?
What’s wrong with my formulation when I write „I have no fear“ so that there
are questions if I’m afraid afterwards? ;-)
Once again: I just said that the proposed restriction won’t be able to prevent
all abuse, which was claimed in an older post.
So I“m so un-afraid, I’d even prefer the more „dangerous“ (I don’t think so)
variant without artificial restrictions.
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
