See below. > On Dec 6, 2017, at 02:45, Nick Keets via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > Apologies, I may have misunderstood you. What I wanted to say is that I see > no problem allowing "dangerous" stuff that may be abused.
You see no problem with danger and abuse? I guess we have differing philosophies... https://developer.apple.com/swift/ states: “Swift eliminates entire classes of unsafe code.” Lets keep it that way. I’m all for this proposal if it can be tweaked to where any of the dangerous invocations contain the word, “Unsafe”, or equivalent. ~Jon
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
