Sorry about my chidish reaction, I just got a bit worried and angry. Keep up the good work and thanks for opening the JDK :)
lg Clemens 2008/1/16, Alexander Potochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello Clemens > > I just want to say thank you for being with us > and sorry for the late response > > Our super-busy days are getting over > and we'll be more responsive > so please keep sending your valuable feedback > > Thanks again > alexp > > > Hi Kirill, > > > >> It's me you're talking about. > >> You're absolutely right about everything you've said. > > Please don't take it personal, its just it happend already so often on > > jdk-collaboration and also here on OpenJDK. If you've luck and you > > find an engineer which takes notice the process is really smooth and > > fine, but otherwise patches are just lost. > > Many others I know about already turned away again. > > If there would something like a patch-review-pipeline, but now a > > contributor posts something and doesn't even know wether anybody took > > notice. > > Sorry that I was so unfriendly :-/ > > > > > >> I'll take a look at your patches. > >> > >> Speaking about InternalFrames, I have a whole project in pending state > >> that uses native Metacity libraries for rendering internal frames. There > >> are no problems with transparent borders, buttons, theme switching > >> there. By now it works on Linux with Metacity 2.18. I didn't have time > >> to port the native sources to Solaris. > >> It's in pending state because my priorities have changed recently. Some > >> day I'll get back to it. > > Oh that sounds great :) > > Well then don't mind about my patches ... great there will be a better > > solution some day :) > > > > Thanks a lot for your reply, lg Clemens > >
