Hello Clemens
Sorry about my chidish reaction, I just got a bit worried and angry.
Your reaction is very understandable,
I would feel the same if I were you
as I said we'll do our best to be more responsive
Keep up the good work and thanks for opening the JDK :)
Thanks!
see you
alexp
lg Clemens
2008/1/16, Alexander Potochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello Clemens
I just want to say thank you for being with us
and sorry for the late response
Our super-busy days are getting over
and we'll be more responsive
so please keep sending your valuable feedback
Thanks again
alexp
Hi Kirill,
It's me you're talking about.
You're absolutely right about everything you've said.
Please don't take it personal, its just it happend already so often on
jdk-collaboration and also here on OpenJDK. If you've luck and you
find an engineer which takes notice the process is really smooth and
fine, but otherwise patches are just lost.
Many others I know about already turned away again.
If there would something like a patch-review-pipeline, but now a
contributor posts something and doesn't even know wether anybody took
notice.
Sorry that I was so unfriendly :-/
I'll take a look at your patches.
Speaking about InternalFrames, I have a whole project in pending state
that uses native Metacity libraries for rendering internal frames. There
are no problems with transparent borders, buttons, theme switching
there. By now it works on Linux with Metacity 2.18. I didn't have time
to port the native sources to Solaris.
It's in pending state because my priorities have changed recently. Some
day I'll get back to it.
Oh that sounds great :)
Well then don't mind about my patches ... great there will be a better
solution some day :)
Thanks a lot for your reply, lg Clemens