On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 14:31 +0100, jonathan wrote: > Sorry but I disagree with Per. ISPs have a duty to prevent email Spam > which is a terrible curse for us all. If they decide that blocking port > 25 outbound will help then they should do it.
Well, preventing customers to use Windows(tm) boxes behind broadband accesses would help much much more to prevent spam. *scnr* > If you are a user, why can't you use the ISPs relay server? If you are a > provider you ought to have your own mail server on a fixed IP address. Because there are pretty much KMU, which are having their own mail server, which is hard to set up if you have to use a relay server with authentication. Some Exchanges still don't support that. If I was a customer, blocking a relevant port is a service downgrade (without proper information) and I would pretty hard insist in cancling the contract. Have a nice day! - Dan _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
