Thomas Kernen wrote:
2points:
[...]
- Press release from SwiNOG, never liked the idea and still don't, I'm a member of SwiNOG (or at least I consider myself as one) but I might not agree with what is stated in the press release, remember that we are not a legal association/company/whatever but a discussion
forum based around a mailing list and bi-annual meetings.
from our charter:
I remember we discussed the proper 'Verein' already twice. I agree that# SwiNOG is non-political, and is not a lobby group. But it may serve as a focus for discussion on technical aspects of political, legal or commercial issues that effect the Swiss Internet. # SwiNOG is aimed at technical personnel working for Service Providers active in Switzerland, but it is open to anyone interested in furthering the SwiNOG goals. Subscription to the mailing list constitutes 'membership' of SwiNOG.
we should not have a 'Vorstand' etc., at least there are no volounteers
around.
However I believe with a press release, we can bring the discussion into public, and this is one goal of SwiNOG, right? Not every member must be necessarily 100% agree to the release. But regarding the topic, we have a consensus. I think it's important that the public is aware, that filtering is _not_ ISP's business.
If the VD court is successful, we will filter every week in the future.
F.
----------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
