>I expect they will change profiles from 256/64k to 320/80k and so on, >nobody telling anything. This is, as far as I understood from Peter >Heinzmann@CNLAB (I was talking to him about 2 weeks ago) what Cablecom >did. There is PPPoE overhead also with cable, right?!
I don't know why P.Heinzmann came to that conclusion. Cablecom didn't change anything on the bitrate it's still 256/64k. Cablecom implemented a traffic-shape mechanism (token bucket) to reach the better throughput. Cablecom doesn't use any PPPoE there's enough "securtity" with 56BitDES on lower layer (docsis). so far ... Orlando -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fredy Kuenzler Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2003 09:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [swinog] ADSL Featured on Kassensturz / SF1 Viktor Steinmann wrote: >> Right! I was very dissappointed. They could at least have pointed >> out, what the term "best effort" means. E.g. that you cannot >> expect the same quality from ADSL than from a leased line. The worst thing was that Brand@Swisscom was blaming the ISP's for bringing too many customers ... >> Swisscom promised to solve the problem till fall. I wonder, how >> they're gonna manage to do that... I expect they will change profiles from 256/64k to 320/80k and so on, nobody telling anything. This is, as far as I understood from Peter Heinzmann@CNLAB (I was talking to him about 2 weeks ago) what Cablecom did. There is PPPoE overhead also with cable, right?! F. ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
