Hi Mike > It remains after-noticing again that there (still) is NO legal obligation > for Provider to prevent Spam.
well but there is also no legal obligation to accept emails from anyone. It's our lone decision and within our "duty" <g> as a postmaster. > A closing from whole IP rank for Mailverkehr consider I against it totally > unfit. I doubt even that such measures are right. In any case ones stand it > in a glaring contrast to the thought of the "free InterNet", because so some > "innocent InterNet user" are punished. And this possibly equal several times > - once by a possibly received Spam, then by the blockade of sending, whereby > most user due to the error message and call then on a most liable to pay the > costs Hotline do not even have to know the reason. poor customers you have :-( According Sheriff Bush and his friends I call this an "collateral damage fighting the axis of evil spamers". Maybe you should better use your time for a state of the art abuse handling? At least as far as I remember there have been a lot of complains during the last few month about your company handling (or better "not-handling") spam-reports. As a provider you can never avoid spam-actions originating from some bad customers within your network - but you can weaken the consequences with a sound "abuse-desk". Greetings nik ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
