Hello Steven Hm - probably got carried away a bit at that ;-). Just imagine, Mr. F�rst downloading my PGP public key and sending me a personalized, encrypted commercial mail offering me a - gosh! - pair of black socks ;-). Would probably make it through my first two anti-spam layers :-| Regards Fermin
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steven Glogger Sent: Thu 10/30/03 13:52 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt because of Spam blocks hi fermin what the hell has PGP with SMTP to do? it uses the same communication channel ;-) And more: what the hell has PGP with SPAM to do?? greetzs steven PGP: http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid14_gci214292,00.html or www.pgpi.org -----Original Message----- From: Fermin Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fermin Sanchez Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt because of Spam blocks Hi Ever heard about PGP? As long as my mail is PGP encrypted, I'd invite about any agency to take their best shot at it. For customers who don't want to send encrypted mail (or are not capable of), there's still the possibility to get an xDSL-Connection with a static IP address. imo Providers should only block dial-up and other dynamic IP ranges from sending mail. As soon as the IP address can be clearly assigned to a company or private person AND there's still SPAM from it, the offender's provider could then block outgoing port 25 connections. Again, let me know if I'm oversimplyfying the matter ... Regards Fermin ________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Peter Keel Sent: Wed 10/29/03 19:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [swinog] Mailempfang wegen SPAM blockiert / Mail receipt because of Spam blocks * on the Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 06:27:12PM +0100, Fermin Sanchez wrote: > Hm - pardon my asking, but: What (legal) reason should a dial-up > user have to send mail over his own mail server? I don't see the > problem in banning *dial-up*-ranges of providers which repeatedly > fail to prevent spam from sometimes repeatedly the same sources. Simple: Running an outgoing-Mailserver on its own. Why? ISPs got to friggin keep the logs of who sent out mail from our servers for _six_ month because some wannabe-gestapoheads decided so. That's a pretty strong incentive to run your own mailserver. Seegras -- Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
<<winmail.dat>>
