On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Matthew Talbert<ransom1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:52 PM, DM Smith<dmsm...@crosswire.org> wrote: >> On 08/31/2009 12:42 PM, DM Smith wrote: >>> >>> I don't think the solution regarding segfaults on a search of only >>> stopwords is the right way to solve the problem. The problem is in clucene >>> or an inappropriate use of it. A bug should be entered into the clucene >>> project for it. >> >> The bug has already been reported and fixed: >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2088975&group_id=80013&atid=558446 >> It is fixed in 0.9.23. > > The problem is that 0.9.23 is considered "unstable", therefore it > isn't included in any of the distros. The problem will have to be > worked around until they have another stable release.
0.9.23 is "unstable" and is over 13 months old. 0.9.21b is the latest stable, and even that dates back to October of last year. Judging from the last two commits on their project page, they're in a refactoring stage - no idea how long that is expected to last. Since 0.9.21b post-dates 0.9.23 - is the bug fixed in 0.9.21b? --Greg > > Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
