> 0.9.23 is "unstable" and is over 13 months old. 0.9.21b is the latest > stable, and even that dates back to October of last year. Judging > from the last two commits on their project page, they're in a > refactoring stage - no idea how long that is expected to last. Since > 0.9.21b post-dates 0.9.23 - is the bug fixed in 0.9.21b?
Stable releases haven't been very forthcoming. No, the bug is *not* fixed in 0.9.21b, as that is what I've been using for testing, both on linux and Windows. I may package 0.9.23 for Windows, but the linux distros aren't going to move to 0.9.23 until it's regarded as stable. Because of that, 0.9.23 may have serious regressions that no one is testing, which is why I haven't moved to it for Windows at this point. Matthew _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
