I think setting PHP5.3 as minimum would be a good one for symfony 2.0, but not before that. And since PHP5.3 seems to be a while ahead yet, that may coincide well.
On Oct 2, 12:23 am, "Dave Dash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow... if that's for real. > > My suspicion is that this feature needs to mature first in PHP, and then the > symfony team would need to be comfortable setting 5.3 as a minimum > requirement... I think that might be a while, simply because it's not > widespread enough. I could very easily see this being useful in terms of > the symfony core classes (ahem, sf*.class.php) and even plugin's lib > classes. > > I don't care what it's called as long as it achieves the ends I'd like, > which is flexibility in naming my classes, and some organization (so long > underscores). > > -d > > On 10/1/07, Alex Haylock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I stumbled across this link today saying that namespaces will be > > available in php5.3 (I didn't think they were due to turn up until > > php6). Will this have any positive or negative impact on symfony > > development? There also seems to be some debate about whether they > > should be referred to as namespaces or packages. > > >http://blog.agoraproduction.com/index.php?/archives/51-Namespaces-has... > > > Anyway, I just wondered what the groups view was on the matter. > > > Thanks, > > > Alex. > > -- > Dave Dash > 612.670.0621 > Discover your favorite restaurant: reviewsby.us > gtalk: dave.dash --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
