On 10/22/07, sokol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As Brian Lozier wrote (http://www.massassi.com/php/articles/ > template_engines/): > "The point of template engines should be to separate your business > logic from your presentation logic, not separate your PHP code from > your HTML code" > > So, you are talking about syntax, but not about separating logic from > view in which Symfony is very good! The difference between template > engines is their syntax and features. So, choose of some template > engine is a subjective sentiment. > > I choose PHP because: > 1. PHP syntax is accustomed for me and I know it very well. > 2. PHP is most powerful template language. > 3. My IDE works with PHP well. > 4. Speed efficiency is very good (and if not, it could be improved > with caching) > > Choosing different template engine you have to learn new "markupped" > language which usually is not simpler than programming language.
I do agree. By experience I know those template «markupped» languages have limitations you sometimes have to bypass. In the end you have templates with an ugly mix of templating language and real scripting language. > My pint is that templates are not for designers but for coders, who > already knows PHP, so there is no need to create something else. +1 -- Grégoire HUBERT Project Manager - Sensio labs http://www.sensiolabs.com/ http://www.symfony-project.com/ Sensio Labs Tél: +33 1 40 99 80 80 > > > -- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
