On 07.09.2010, at 11:23, Fabien Potencier wrote: > On 9/7/10 9:43 AM, Jordi Boggiano wrote: >> Heya, >> >> Didn't look at the patch itself, but conceptually I kinda like it. >> >> I'm not sure however if the multiplication of configuration options >> (xml/yaml/php/annotations) isn't gonna bite us in the ass at some point >> int he future.. It's nice and all that things are so flexible but aren't >> we abusing it at the moment? > > I have the exact same concern. We need to settle on one default configuration > format (especially for the documentation -- even if right now, we always > provide all formats in a nice tabbed box). > > What other think?
i think it will be non trivial to offer a proper cascade logic when extending classes with annotations to be able to customize things. for example with a route, the controller shouldn't care about what the URL's look like, there could actually be multiple URL's all pointing to the same controller. All the controller should care about is the parameters being passed to it. regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith [email protected] -- If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to security at symfony-project.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
