On 9/7/10 11:29 AM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
On 07.09.2010, at 11:23, Fabien Potencier wrote:
On 9/7/10 9:43 AM, Jordi Boggiano wrote:
Heya,
Didn't look at the patch itself, but conceptually I kinda like it.
I'm not sure however if the multiplication of configuration options
(xml/yaml/php/annotations) isn't gonna bite us in the ass at some point
int he future.. It's nice and all that things are so flexible but aren't
we abusing it at the moment?
I have the exact same concern. We need to settle on one default configuration
format (especially for the documentation -- even if right now, we always
provide all formats in a nice tabbed box).
What other think?
i think it will be non trivial to offer a proper cascade logic when extending
classes with annotations to be able to customize things. for example with a
route, the controller shouldn't care about what the URL's look like, there
could actually be multiple URL's all pointing to the same controller. All the
controller should care about is the parameters being passed to it.
Right. I think you are talking about the FrameworkExtraBundle I have
just released. As I said, I see it as a nice way to create prototypes
faster. Also, I have provided a bunch of annotations to see which ones
looks nice, and which ones are not good at all. I hope we as a community
will have a discussion about that.
Fabien
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
[email protected]
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
