Hi all, On 26 mar, 16:50, "Nicolas Perriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree that an 'email' column should exist by default in > sf_guard_user table, it's a so common needed information on web apps > nowadays. It'd be a bit overkill to manage a foreign profile table to > just store such a column...
In practice, cases where you have to manage a profile table for only ONE column are very rare. I think I never met one because not only email but things like name, last_name are barely always needed (even they are not mandatory). Considering this I dont think getting email outside the sf_guard_user is such a big deal and that's a good way to providing a clean extensible model. Nicolas, thanks for opening symfonians code, that's a really great initiative. I didn't go deeper on it but is there any reason to have an Activation table rather that an activation_key on the profile table ? BTW I really like the blue link styles on your Trac :) Jerôme Texier > > ++ > > -- > Nicolas Perriaulthttp://prendreuncafe.com/blog > GSM: 06.60.92.08.67 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
