On 28 mar, 10:48, Lee Bolding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, if using sfGuard you cannot rely on email address being
> available for use in forgotten password functionality - as this
> requires that not only sfGuardUserProfile has been implemented (which
> as we know is optional), but that it has also been implemented with
> the property you are depending on (say 'email' [and not
> 'email_address', 'e-mail' etc]). That's two very big - and stupid
> assumptions, which limit the usefulness of the plugin. Both of those
> assumptions are negated by simply including an 'email' column in the
> sf_guard_user schema.
Sorry I don't really get it. :)
If an email property is not implemented then request password by email
functionality should be useless anyway on this project.
In the other hand, if an email property is implemented and a request
password by email functionality is needed, this one should read the
email property name in a config file (as it done for the profile table
name which is configurable), avoiding problems of 'email', 'mail' etc.
you mentionned.
So, again, I don't think there's a big issue here.
Regards.
Jérôme
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
