On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Jérôme TEXIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicolas, thanks for opening symfonians code, that's a really great > initiative. > I didn't go deeper on it but is there any reason to have an Activation > table rather that an activation_key on the profile table ? Well, not really. Maybe I thought my sf_guard_user table had enough columns :) Someday I'll refactor the code to have a separate profile from the sfGuardUser, but this will imply heavy schema and data migrations. Stay tuned (or help me by submitting patches ^__^) ++ -- Nicolas Perriault http://prendreuncafe.com/blog GSM: 06.60.92.08.67 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
