On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:29 AM, smichr <[email protected]> wrote: >> The similarity between "simpify" and "simplify" is misleading. > > Yes, that would be...but it's SYMpify not SIMpify. But yes, they are > close. I (as has been pointed out) almost exclusively use S() and so > it's not a problem. Would there be any reason not to delete sympify > from the namespace and just provide S() as the standard conversion > call name?
It seems like a good plan if everybody agrees. I believe S is some other global object, so it should be renamed and S should be a function. sympify() should return a deprecated warning for some time, before we remove it. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
