On 7 Dez., 03:13, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Aaron S. Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I for one think we should keep sympify() (and the S() shortcut). sympify() > > gives a nice character to SymPy, as a function named after it. I certainly > > don't see why you would want to delete sympify() and just keep S(). How is > > that better than just keeping sympify() but always using S()? And besides, > > 'sympify' is almost guaranteed to be unique to any namespace it is imported > > into, whereas this is likely not the case for 'S'. > > After thinking about it for a while, I think you are right, we should > probably keep both.
I think S should not be standard, because it violates the convention that functions are lowercase. It's just a shortcut. Vinzent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
