On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Vinzent Steinberg < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 7 Dez., 03:13, Ondrej Certik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Aaron S. Meurer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I for one think we should keep sympify() (and the S() shortcut). > sympify() gives a nice character to SymPy, as a function named after it. I > certainly don't see why you would want to delete sympify() and just keep > S(). How is that better than just keeping sympify() but always using S()? > And besides, 'sympify' is almost guaranteed to be unique to any namespace > it is imported into, whereas this is likely not the case for 'S'. > > > > After thinking about it for a while, I think you are right, we should > > probably keep both. > > I think S should not be standard, because it violates the convention > that functions are lowercase. It's just a shortcut. > > +1 > Vinzent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <sympy%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > > -- Brian E. Granger, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Physics Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo [email protected] [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
