On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I have made the first release candidate for SymPy 0.7.1. You can > download the source at > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1.tar.gz, > a Windows32 installer at > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1.win32.exe, > and the docs for this version at > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/downloads/detail?name=sympy-0.7.1.rc1-docs-html.zip. > > The release notes are at > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes-for-0.7.1. I will > give this in more detail when I do the full release, but the big > changes here are that isympy now works in IPython 0.11, which will be > released soon, Pyglet is now an optional external dependency, Python > 2.4 is no longer supported, and our docs use MathJax to render the > LaTeX math. There have also been several bug fixes and new > functionality (see the full release notes). > > So please download the release and test it. Also, since our docs have > received a significant update with the MathJax, I ask that you also > download the docs and see if they render correctly in your broswer of > choice. Some pages that use a lot of MathJax math include > modules/simplify/hyperexpand.html, most of the mpmath documentation, > and modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html. We also enabled a feature in > Sphinx that lets you view the source code of a function in the > documentation. So, next to every function definition, there should be > a "source" button which takes you to the source code of the function. > > If there are no major problems, I will do the full release in about a week. > > Aaron Meurer > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > >
I've run the usual tests on my computer, everything seems fine. One issue is the hyperexpand tests. They rely on random numbers so they fail occasionally (see the SymPy-hyperexpand job on Jenkins, they fail about 1% of the time with ness' latest patch). This is bad because users might think this is some more important failure. On the other hand, simply reverting the whole patchset is no good either, as it does bring nice new features. So, if ness doesn't manage to solve it completely in a few days it might be a good idea to apply a patch to branch that'll use some specific numbers in the tests. -- Vladimir Perić -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
